State v. Box

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Box

81 S.W.3d 79, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 751, 2002 WL 523144

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 9, 2002

DocketNo. ED 79685

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 S.W.3d 79 (State v. Box) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Box, 81 S.W.3d 79, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 751, 2002 WL 523144 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Michael Box, appeals from the judgment and sentence entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, burglary in the first degree, two counts of felony stealing without consent and exceeding the posted speed limit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have, however, been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Michael Box, appeals from the judgment and sentence entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, burglary in the first degree, two counts of felony stealing without consent and exceeding the posted speed limit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have, however, been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 S.W.3d 79, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 751, 2002 WL 523144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-box-moctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack