State v. Bowman

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Bowman. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 Haw. 398
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 25, 2015·No. SCWC-13-0005863·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0005863 25-JUN-2015 02:50 PM

SCWC-13-0005863

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

MAX C.K. BOWMAN,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0005863; CASE NO. 3DTC-13-067572)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on May 22, 2015, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 25, 2015.

Benjamin E. Lowenthal /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald and Jo Kim for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Jason R. Kwiat for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bowman, (haw 2015).

State v. Bowman (State v. Bowman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.