State v. Bowers

842 P.2d 819, 117 Or. App. 535, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2561
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 30, 1992
DocketC891431CR; CA A69004, A69076
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 842 P.2d 819 (State v. Bowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bowers, 842 P.2d 819, 117 Or. App. 535, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2561 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals convictions, after a jury trial, on one count of sodomy in the first degree, ORS 163.405, five counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, and one count of furnishing obscene material to a minor. ORS 167.065.

He argues that each count of the indictment is subject to demurrer on the ground that the Statute of Limitations had expired before the indictment was returned. He raises the limitation issue for the first time on appeal. That is too late. We decline to address that claim of error.

The other assignments of error do not warrant discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Chelemedos
398 P.3d 415 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
842 P.2d 819, 117 Or. App. 535, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bowers-orctapp-1992.