State v. Bowen

75 S.E.2d 927, 237 N.C. 766, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 720
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 20, 1953·Published

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

In this Court the defendant moves in arrest of judgment. The Attorney-General concedes error in the judgment for the reason set out in S. v. Thomas, 236 N.C. 454, 73 S.E. 2d 283.

The motion in arrest of judgment is allowed, and the case remanded to the Superior Court of Durham County for trial upon a bill of indictment or for such other disposition as the law provides. S. v. Williams, ante, 436, 75 S.E. 2d 703; S. v. Bailey, ante, 273, 74 S.E. 2d 209; S. v. Pitt, ante, 274, 74 S.E. 2d 609.

Judgment arrested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bowen, 75 S.E.2d 927, 237 N.C. 766, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 720 (N.C. 1953).

75 S.E.2d 927 (State v. Bowen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patterson v. Saunders
74 S.E.2d 204 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1953)
State v. Bailey
74 S.E.2d 609 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)