State v. Boutin

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Boutin

450 So. 2d 42, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 8717

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided May 16, 1984·No. No. CR83-725·Published

Opinion

FORET, Judge.

Defendant, Claude M. Boutin, was charged by bill of information with driving [43] while intoxicated (third offense), in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:98. On May 12, 1983, the defendant waived his right to a jury trial and was tried before the district judge. He was found guilty.

On May 24, 1983, the defendant was sentenced to a term of three years at hard labor, which was suspended, and he was placed on supervised probation, with the special condition of probation being that he pay a fine of $1,000 plus court costs and serve one year in the Lafayette Community Correctional Center and attend the Court Sobriety Program and Driving Program.

The defendant filed a motion for appeal but has not filed any assignments of error nor has a brief been filed. Consequently, this case will only be reviewed for errors patent on the face of the record. State v. Jimmerson, 432 So.2d 1093 (La.App. 3 Cir.1983). We have fully reviewed the record for these errors and find none.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FORET, Judge.

Defendant, Claude M. Boutin, was charged by bill of information with driving [43] while intoxicated (third offense), in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:98. On May 12, 1983, the defendant waived his right to a jury trial and was tried before the district judge. He was found guilty.

On May 24, 1983, the defendant was sentenced to a term of three years at hard labor, which was suspended, and he was placed on supervised probation, with the special condition of probation being that he pay a fine of $1,000 plus court costs and serve one year in the Lafayette Community Correctional Center and attend the Court Sobriety Program and Driving Program.

The defendant filed a motion for appeal but has not filed any assignments of error nor has a brief been filed. Consequently, this case will only be reviewed for errors patent on the face of the record. State v. Jimmerson, 432 So.2d 1093 (La.App. 3 Cir.1983). We have fully reviewed the record for these errors and find none.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

State v. Boutin, 450 So. 2d 42, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 8717 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

450 So. 2d 42 (State v. Boutin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related