State v. Bouska
This text of 842 P.2d 815 (State v. Bouska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of theft in the first degree. He appeals, challenging only the special conditions of his probation. ORS 138.060; ORS 138.053(l)(c). He was ordered to enroll in an alcohol treatment program, abstain from using intoxicants and voluntarily submit to breath or blood tests when requested by his probation officer.
The state concedes that there was no connection between the consumption of alcohol and commission of the crime. We accept the concession.
Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
842 P.2d 815, 117 Or. App. 355, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2438, 1992 WL 381975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bouska-orctapp-1992.