State v. Bourque

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Bourque

160 So. 3d 1291, 2015 La. LEXIS 599, 2015 WL 1510395

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 13, 2015

DocketNo. 2014-OK-2585

StatusPublished

This text of 160 So. 3d 1291 (State v. Bourque) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bourque, 160 So. 3d 1291, 2015 La. LEXIS 599, 2015 WL 1510395 (La. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Scott J. Bourque; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Martin, 16th Judicial District Court Div. E, Nos. 90-116,325, 138,657; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 14-00524.

Granted in part; denied in part. • The court of appeal’s ruling ordering an evi-dentiary hearing is vacated. The matter is remanded to the district court for consideration of relator’s pro se application for post-conviction relief filed in 2012 seeking an out-of-time appeal of the district court’s 1997 judgment denying his request to discharge his attorneys, to terminate his appeal, and to expedite his execution on grounds that he was not competent to understand his legal position and the options available to him. In all other respects, the writ application, which includes [1292]*1292relator’s pro se filings in this court, is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Scott J. Bourque; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Martin, 16th Judicial District Court Div. E, Nos. 90-116,325, 138,657; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 14-00524.

Granted in part; denied in part. • The court of appeal’s ruling ordering an evi-dentiary hearing is vacated. The matter is remanded to the district court for consideration of relator’s pro se application for post-conviction relief filed in 2012 seeking an out-of-time appeal of the district court’s 1997 judgment denying his request to discharge his attorneys, to terminate his appeal, and to expedite his execution on grounds that he was not competent to understand his legal position and the options available to him. In all other respects, the writ application, which includes [1292]*1292relator’s pro se filings in this court, is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 So. 3d 1291, 2015 La. LEXIS 599, 2015 WL 1510395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bourque-la-2015.