State v. Bourque

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Bourque

444 So. 2d 1208, 1984 La. LEXIS 8284

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 3, 1984·No. No. 83-KH-0850·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The case is remanded to the district court to reconsider (1) the legality of consecutive terms of probation which total ten years and (2) the time period allowed for payment of relator’s fines. In this connection the district court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing on relator’s ability to pay $4,000 in fines prior to completing his two-year jail sentence and shall appoint counsel for relator for the hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The case is remanded to the district court to reconsider (1) the legality of consecutive terms of probation which total ten years and (2) the time period allowed for payment of relator’s fines. In this connection the district court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing on relator’s ability to pay $4,000 in fines prior to completing his two-year jail sentence and shall appoint counsel for relator for the hearing.

State v. Bourque, 444 So. 2d 1208, 1984 La. LEXIS 8284 (La. 1984).

Pincite

444 So. 2d 1208 (State v. Bourque) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related