State v. Bounds

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bounds

371 S.W.3d 807, 2012 WL 1165885, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 491

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 2012·No. No. WD 73638·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Danny Bounds appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of two counts of burglary in the second degree, tampering with a motor vehicle in the first degree, possession of burglary tools, and three counts of stealing after a jury trial. Bounds contends that the trial court erred in: (1) overruling Bounds’s objections to the State’s questions of witnesses and statements in closing argument regarding his post-arrest silence; (2) refusing to grant a mistrial after the State made inflammatory comments in closing argument; and (8) denying Bounds’s motion for judgment of acquittal based on the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Danny Bounds appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of two counts of burglary in the second degree, tampering with a motor vehicle in the first degree, possession of burglary tools, and three counts of stealing after a jury trial. Bounds contends that the trial court erred in: (1) overruling Bounds’s objections to the State’s questions of witnesses and statements in closing argument regarding his post-arrest silence; (2) refusing to grant a mistrial after the State made inflammatory comments in closing argument; and (8) denying Bounds’s motion for judgment of acquittal based on the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Bounds, 371 S.W.3d 807, 2012 WL 1165885, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 491 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

371 S.W.3d 807 (State v. Bounds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.