State v. Boulware
This text of 492 S.W.3d 667 (State v. Boulware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Ryan Boulware appeals the judgment of convictions and sentences for driving while revoked and resisting arrest. He argues that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing a law enforcement officer to testify that the treads on Boulware’s .shoes shared characteristics with the shoeprint he found, in allowing another officer to testify about visits he made to Boulware’s residence earlier during the month of Boulware’s .crimes, and for overruling Boulware’s motion for judgment of acquittal. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been provided a memorandum.
The- judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
492 S.W.3d 667, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 655, 2016 WL 3538504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boulware-moctapp-2016.