State v. Botelho

636 A.2d 1333, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 37, 1994 WL 33934
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedFebruary 3, 1994
DocketNo. 92-326-C.A.
StatusPublished

This text of 636 A.2d 1333 (State v. Botelho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Botelho, 636 A.2d 1333, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 37, 1994 WL 33934 (R.I. 1994).

Opinion

ORDER

This case came before the court for oral argument January 27, 1994, pursuant to an order that had directed the defendant to appear and show cause why the issues raised in his appeal should not be summarily decided.

After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown. The record discloses that evidence presented on behalf of the state was reasonably satisfactory in establishing that the defendant had violated his probation by committing an assault upon Lisa Martineau.

Consequently, the defendant’s appeal is denied and dismissed. The finding of violation is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
636 A.2d 1333, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 37, 1994 WL 33934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-botelho-ri-1994.