State v. Botelho

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

State v. Botelho

636 A.2d 1333, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 37, 1994 WL 33934

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided February 3, 1994·No. No. 92-326-C.A.·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This case came before the court for oral argument January 27, 1994, pursuant to an order that had directed the defendant to appear and show cause why the issues raised in his appeal should not be summarily decided.

After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown. The record discloses that evidence presented on behalf of the state was reasonably satisfactory in establishing that the defendant had violated his probation by committing an assault upon Lisa Martineau.

Consequently, the defendant’s appeal is denied and dismissed. The finding of violation is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This case came before the court for oral argument January 27, 1994, pursuant to an order that had directed the defendant to appear and show cause why the issues raised in his appeal should not be summarily decided.

After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown. The record discloses that evidence presented on behalf of the state was reasonably satisfactory in establishing that the defendant had violated his probation by committing an assault upon Lisa Martineau.

Consequently, the defendant’s appeal is denied and dismissed. The finding of violation is affirmed.

State v. Botelho, 636 A.2d 1333, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 37, 1994 WL 33934 (R.I. 1994).

Pincite

636 A.2d 1333 (State v. Botelho) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.