State v. Boswell

481 A.2d 823, 125 N.H. 460, 1984 N.H. LEXIS 301
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedAugust 27, 1984
DocketNo. 83-100
StatusPublished

This text of 481 A.2d 823 (State v. Boswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Boswell, 481 A.2d 823, 125 N.H. 460, 1984 N.H. LEXIS 301 (N.H. 1984).

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion

Counsel for the defendant advised the court that the State had withdrawn the habitual offender petition filed against his client. [461]*461Before that withdrawal, the defendant had raised the issue of an indigent defendant’s right to appointed counsel at an habitual offender proceeding. The companion case of State v. Cook, 125 N.H. 452, 481 A.2d 823 (1984), raised the same issue, and we have ruled on it by our opinion of even date. Counsel is not entitled to payment from public funds.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cook
481 A.2d 823 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
481 A.2d 823, 125 N.H. 460, 1984 N.H. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boswell-nh-1984.