State v. Boston

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Boston

550 S.W.3d 149

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 3, 2018

DocketWD 80680

StatusPublished

This text of 550 S.W.3d 149 (State v. Boston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Boston, 550 S.W.3d 149 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mr. Corey Desean Boston appeals his conviction by a Cole County jury of second-degree burglary and second-degree tampering. The court sentenced him, as recommended by the jury, to concurrent terms of one year in jail on the burglary charge and six months in jail on the tampering charge, with credit for time served. Mr. Boston challenges the trial court's ruling on his Batson objection and raises an ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim on this direct appeal.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Mr. Corey Desean Boston appeals his conviction by a Cole County jury of second-degree burglary and second-degree tampering. The court sentenced him, as recommended by the jury, to concurrent terms of one year in jail on the burglary charge and six months in jail on the tampering charge, with credit for time served. Mr. Boston challenges the trial court's ruling on his Batson objection and raises an ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim on this direct appeal.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

550 S.W.3d 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boston-moctapp-2018.