State v. Boston
This text of 2 Del. 529 (State v. Boston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Coin embraced by the term chattels.
On an objection that an indictment for stealing certain pieces of coin called dollars, the "goods and chattels" of H. S., could not be sustained, on the ground that they were not goods or chattels; it wasruled, that money or coin is embraced under the term chattels in our statute; that if it was not so, stealing it could not be punished. Sussex, 1834. State vs. Boston.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Del. 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boston-delsuperct-1834.