State v. Bostick

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Bostick

145 S.E. 927, 148 S.C. 186, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 192

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 16, 1928·No. 12526·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice' Cothran.

The defendant was convicted under an indictment charging him with unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. From the judgment and sentence, he has appealed. Upon consideration of the evidence in the case, a detailed statement of which will serve no useful purpose, the Court is of the opinion that the verdict is wholly unsustained by the evidence. The judgment of the Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, and that the case be remanded to that Court for a new trial.

Mr. Chiee Justice Watts, and Messrs. Justices BeeasE, StabeER, and Carter concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice' Cothran.

The defendant was convicted under an indictment charging him with unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. From the judgment and sentence, he has appealed. Upon consideration of the evidence in the case, a detailed statement of which will serve no useful purpose, the Court is of the opinion that the verdict is wholly unsustained by the evidence. The judgment of the Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, and that the case be remanded to that Court for a new trial.

Mr. Chiee Justice Watts, and Messrs. Justices BeeasE, StabeER, and Carter concur.

State v. Bostick, 145 S.E. 927, 148 S.C. 186, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 192 (S.C. 1928).

Pincite

145 S.E. 927 (State v. Bostick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.