State v. BOSSALLER

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. BOSSALLER

276 S.W.3d 393, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 79, 2009 WL 242105

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 3, 2009·No. ED 91030·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Festus Bossaller, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Osage County following his conviction by a jury of first-degree burglary, in violation of section 569.160 RSMo. (2000). We affirm the trial court’s judgment because the defendant’s claim is not preserved, and we decline plain-error review.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Festus Bossaller, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Osage County following his conviction by a jury of first-degree burglary, in violation of section 569.160 RSMo. (2000). We affirm the trial court’s judgment because the defendant’s claim is not preserved, and we decline plain-error review.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. BOSSALLER, 276 S.W.3d 393, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 79, 2009 WL 242105 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

276 S.W.3d 393 (State v. BOSSALLER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.