State v. Boss

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Boss

254 S.W.3d 909, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 788, 2008 WL 2345897

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 10, 2008

DocketED 89592

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 S.W.3d 909 (State v. Boss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Boss, 254 S.W.3d 909, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 788, 2008 WL 2345897 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Alfred L. Boss, Jr., appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of forcible rape, Section 566.030 RSMo 2000; forcible sodomy, Section 566.060 RSMo 2000; and first-degree burglary, Section 569.160 RSMo 2000. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their in *910 formation only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Alfred L. Boss, Jr., appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of forcible rape, Section 566.030 RSMo 2000; forcible sodomy, Section 566.060 RSMo 2000; and first-degree burglary, Section 569.160 RSMo 2000. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their in *910 formation only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 S.W.3d 909, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 788, 2008 WL 2345897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boss-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack