State v. Borden

2017 ND 46
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided March 7, 2017·No. 20160187·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Filed 3/7/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2017 ND 46

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Antonio Shaquille Borden, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20160187

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John E. Greenwood, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Frederick R. Fremgen, Assistant State’s Attorney, 511 Second Avenue S.E., Jamestown, ND 58401, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.

Russell J. Myhre, 341 Central Avenue North, Suite 3, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, ND 58072, for defendant and appellant; on brief.

State v. Borden

[¶1] Antonio Borden appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition, aggravated assault, and menacing.  On appeal, Borden argues the guilty verdicts are not supported by sufficient evidence.  We conclude the State presented sufficient evidence and summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Douglas L. Mattson, D.J.

[¶3] The Honorable Douglas L. Mattson, D.J., sitting in place of Tufte, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Borden, 2017 ND 46 (N.D. 2017).

2017 ND 46 (State v. Borden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Langved v. Continental Resources, Inc.
2017 ND 179 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2017)