State v. Borden
This text of 2017 ND 46 (State v. Borden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 3/7/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2017 ND 46
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Antonio Shaquille Borden, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20160187
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John E. Greenwood, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Frederick R. Fremgen, Assistant State’s Attorney, 511 Second Avenue S.E., Jamestown, ND 58401, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
Russell J. Myhre, 341 Central Avenue North, Suite 3, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, ND 58072, for defendant and appellant; on brief.
State v. Borden
[¶1] Antonio Borden appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition, aggravated assault, and menacing. On appeal, Borden argues the guilty verdicts are not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude the State presented sufficient evidence and summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Douglas L. Mattson, D.J.
[¶3] The Honorable Douglas L. Mattson, D.J., sitting in place of Tufte, J., disqualified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 ND 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-borden-nd-2017.