State v. Booth

672 So. 2d 35, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 166, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 596, 1996 WL 169136
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 11, 1996
DocketNo. 85661
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 672 So. 2d 35 (State v. Booth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Booth, 672 So. 2d 35, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 166, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 596, 1996 WL 169136 (Fla. 1996).

Opinions

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Booth v. State, 654 So.2d 571 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), based on conflict with Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla.1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

Our decision in State v. Blackwell, 661 So.2d 282 (Fla.1995), controls. We quash Booth and remand for proceedings consistent with Blackwell.1

It is so ordered.

[36]*36GRIMES, C.J., and KOGAN, HARDING and WELLS, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with an opinion. OVERTON, J., dissents with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. State
699 So. 2d 624 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
672 So. 2d 35, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 166, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 596, 1996 WL 169136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-booth-fla-1996.