State v. Boone

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedAugust 22, 2011
Docket2011-UP-399
StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Boone (State v. Boone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Boone, (S.C. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James Wesley Boone, Appellant.


Appeal From Sumter County
George C. James, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-399
Submitted August 15, 2011 – Filed August 22, 2011


AFFIRMED


Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Christina J. Catoe, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ernest A. Finney, III, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  James Wesley Boone appeals his sentence for armed robbery, arguing fourteen years' imprisonment was an abuse of discretion of the circuit court and cruel and unusual punishment.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:  Roddy v. State, 339 S.C. 29, 36, 528 S.E.2d 418, 422 (2000) ("[W]here the [circuit court] satisfies the requirements of Boykin [v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969)], [it] is not further required to tell a defendant the [circuit] court is not bound by a negotiated plea agreement."); Brooks v State, 325 S.C. 269, 272, 481 S.E.2d 712, 713 (1997) ("A sentence is not excessive if it is within statutory limitations and there are no facts supporting an allegation of prejudice against defendant.").

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boykin v. Alabama
395 U.S. 238 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Roddy v. State
528 S.E.2d 418 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2000)
Brooks v. State
481 S.E.2d 712 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Boone, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boone-scctapp-2011.