State v. Boone
30 Ind. 225
Opinion
The appellee was indicted under the act of March 9, 1867 (Acts 1867, p. 128), for seining and catching fish contrary to its provisions.
It was claimed that the law is unconstitutional, and the court below, on the motion of the defendant, quashed the indictment. This was wrong. This question was met and settled by this court in Gentile v. The State, 29 Ind. 409.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to overrule the motion to quash, and for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Boone, 30 Ind. 225 (Ind. 1868).
30 Ind. 225 (State v. Boone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Long v. State
92 N.E. 653 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
Townsend v. State
37 L.R.A. 294 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1897)
State v. Lewis
20 L.R.A. 52 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1893)
People v. Bridges
16 L.R.A. 684 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1892)
State ex rel. City of Terre Haute v. Kolsem
14 L.R.A. 566 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)
Kelly v. State ex rel. First National Bank
92 Ind. 236 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)
Stuttsman v. State
57 Ind. 119 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)
Vickery v. Chase
50 Ind. 461 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1875)
State ex rel. Pitman v. Tucker
46 Ind. 355 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)