State v. Bonnett

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bonnett

297 S.W.3d 138, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1580, 2009 WL 3754001

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 10, 2009·No. ED 91891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Gregory Bonnett, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of one count of forcible rape, in violation of section 566.030 RSMo. (Supp.2006). The trial court sentenced the defendant as a prior offender to 25 years of imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Gregory Bonnett, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of one count of forcible rape, in violation of section 566.030 RSMo. (Supp.2006). The trial court sentenced the defendant as a prior offender to 25 years of imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Bonnett, 297 S.W.3d 138, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1580, 2009 WL 3754001 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

297 S.W.3d 138 (State v. Bonnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related