State v. Bonanno

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Bonanno

98 Ohio St. 3d 1417

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 22, 2003

Docket2002-1484

StatusPublished

This text of 98 Ohio St. 3d 1417 (State v. Bonanno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bonanno, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1417 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Allen App. No. 1-02-21, 2002-Ohio-4005. This cause is pending before the court as a claimed appeal of right. On September 20, 2002, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B), nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within 20 days of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 111(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen App. No. 1-02-21, 2002-Ohio-4005. This cause is pending before the court as a claimed appeal of right. On September 20, 2002, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B), nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within 20 days of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 111(6).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 Ohio St. 3d 1417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bonanno-ohio-2003.