State v. Bolton
223 S.E.2d 390, 289 N.C. 616, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1352
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Maxie Ray BOLTON.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
James J. Wall, for defendant.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Joan H. Byers, Associate Atty., for State.
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 28 N.C.App. 497, 221 S.E.2d 747. Denied. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Bolton, 223 S.E.2d 390, 289 N.C. 616, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1352 (N.C. 1976).
223 S.E.2d 390 (State v. Bolton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Lynch
265 S.E.2d 491 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)