State v. Bolton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bolton

546 S.W.3d 624

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 27, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105511

StatusPublished

This text of 546 S.W.3d 624 (State v. Bolton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bolton, 546 S.W.3d 624 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Arthur Bolton appeals from the judgment of the trial court, entered after a jury found him guilty of first-degree murder and armed criminal action. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Arthur Bolton appeals from the judgment of the trial court, entered after a jury found him guilty of first-degree murder and armed criminal action. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

546 S.W.3d 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bolton-moctapp-2018.