State v. Boling

Florida Circuit Courts

State v. Boling

20 Fla. Supp. 2d 158

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedDecember 30, 1986

DocketCase No. 85-153 AC

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Fla. Supp. 2d 158 (State v. Boling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Boling, 20 Fla. Supp. 2d 158 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal by the State it argues that the defendant waived speedy trial and that the court’s Order for Discharge was in error. The defendant was, on two occasions, not ready for trial and an unexcused continuance should have been attributed to the defendant. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.191(d)(3); Butterworth v. Fluellen, 389 So.2d 968 (Fla. [159]*1591980); Rutledge v. State, 374 So.2d 975 (Fla. 1979); Butler v. Cullen, 253 SO.2d 861 (Fla. 1971); J.B. v. Karda, 436 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Hernandez v. State, 397 SO.2d 435 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Wright v. State, 396 SO.2d 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Rosenwasser v. Smith, 308 SO.2d 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

The Order of Dismissal is vacated and the cause is remanded to the trial court for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal by the State it argues that the defendant waived speedy trial and that the court’s Order for Discharge was in error. The defendant was, on two occasions, not ready for trial and an unexcused continuance should have been attributed to the defendant. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.191(d)(3); Butterworth v. Fluellen, 389 So.2d 968 (Fla. [159]*1591980); Rutledge v. State, 374 So.2d 975 (Fla. 1979); Butler v. Cullen, 253 SO.2d 861 (Fla. 1971); J.B. v. Karda, 436 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Hernandez v. State, 397 SO.2d 435 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Wright v. State, 396 SO.2d 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Rosenwasser v. Smith, 308 SO.2d 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

The Order of Dismissal is vacated and the cause is remanded to the trial court for trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Fla. Supp. 2d 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boling-flacirct-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack