Home/Supreme Court of Florida/State v. Boley

State v. Boley

287 So. 2d 668, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4075
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 1973
DocketNo. 43531
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 287 So. 2d 668 (State v. Boley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Boley, 287 So. 2d 668, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4075 (Fla. 1973).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari directed to the opinion of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, reported at 273 So.2d 109 (Fla.1973), reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have considered this case without oral argument. Upon such further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Fla.Const., art. V, § 3(b)(3), F.S.A. Therefore, the writ of certiorari must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., concurring specially, in which ROBERTS, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mobley v. State
460 So. 2d 383 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Fike v. State
455 So. 2d 628 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Young v. State
439 So. 2d 306 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Phillips v. State
438 So. 2d 886 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Patterson v. State
313 So. 2d 712 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
287 So. 2d 668, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boley-fla-1973.