State v. Bolden

905 So. 2d 1085, 2005 La. LEXIS 2288, 2005 WL 1800755
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided July 18, 2005·No. No. 2005-KK-1841·Published

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 03-6117; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 05-K-611.

Writ granted. Judgment of the trial court granting the motion to suppress evidence is vacated and set aside. Case remanded to the trial court for an evidentia-ry hearing and determination whether the [1086] police officers did or did not knock and announce prior to execution of the search warrant and, if not, whether the unannounced search was reasonable in view of any law enforcement interests that may have been present at the time. See State v. Thompson, 96-2052 (La.11/15/96), 682 So.2d 745; Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927, 115 S.Ct. 1914, 131 L.Ed.2d 976 (1995).

JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bolden, 905 So. 2d 1085, 2005 La. LEXIS 2288, 2005 WL 1800755 (La. 2005).

905 So. 2d 1085 (State v. Bolden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Arkansas
514 U.S. 927 (Supreme Court, 1995)
State v. Thompson
682 So. 2d 745 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)
Bridges v. May
1 Thompson 96 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1853)