State v. Bohlen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bohlen

545 S.W.2d 673, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2696

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 7, 1976

DocketNo. 37369

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 545 S.W.2d 673 (State v. Bohlen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bohlen, 545 S.W.2d 673, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2696 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

DOWD, Judge.

The defendant was indicted for common assault. § 559.220 RSMo 1969. The defendant waived a trial by jury. Defendant was tried by a judge of the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction, found guilty, and was sentenced to six months in the City Workhouse.

The assault took place in a schoolyard on May 24, 1974. Defendant struck the victim, Mr. Willie Cole, with his fist and threw bricks at him. One school child also hit the victim with a brick.

The victim was knocked unconscious and sustained injuries to the back of his head and his ear. His lip required several stitches, and he suffered a broken leg. Eighteen months after the assault the victim was still on crutches.

Defendant did not deny the assault at trial but claimed it was in self defense. His sole point on appeal is that the verdict was “against the weight of evidence as a matter of law.”

In a jury waived criminal case the findings of the court have the force and effect of the verdict of a jury. State v. Odzark, 532 S.W.2d 45, 49[6] (Mo.App.1976). Therefore, the appellate court does not weigh the evidence. State v. Simmons, 494 S.W.2d 302, 303[2] (Mo.1973); State v. Graham, 527 S.W.2d 936, 947[16] (Mo.App.1975). The weighing of the evidence is a matter for the trial judge who hears the witnesses and is in a position to judge their credibility. State v. Minor, 531 S.W.2d 101, 102[1] (Mo.App.1975). The point is without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

WEIER, P. J., and CLEMENS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOWD, Judge.

The defendant was indicted for common assault. § 559.220 RSMo 1969. The defendant waived a trial by jury. Defendant was tried by a judge of the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction, found guilty, and was sentenced to six months in the City Workhouse.

The assault took place in a schoolyard on May 24, 1974. Defendant struck the victim, Mr. Willie Cole, with his fist and threw bricks at him. One school child also hit the victim with a brick.

The victim was knocked unconscious and sustained injuries to the back of his head and his ear. His lip required several stitches, and he suffered a broken leg. Eighteen months after the assault the victim was still on crutches.

Defendant did not deny the assault at trial but claimed it was in self defense. His sole point on appeal is that the verdict was “against the weight of evidence as a matter of law.”

In a jury waived criminal case the findings of the court have the force and effect of the verdict of a jury. State v. Odzark, 532 S.W.2d 45, 49[6] (Mo.App.1976). Therefore, the appellate court does not weigh the evidence. State v. Simmons, 494 S.W.2d 302, 303[2] (Mo.1973); State v. Graham, 527 S.W.2d 936, 947[16] (Mo.App.1975). The weighing of the evidence is a matter for the trial judge who hears the witnesses and is in a position to judge their credibility. State v. Minor, 531 S.W.2d 101, 102[1] (Mo.App.1975). The point is without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

WEIER, P. J., and CLEMENS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

545 S.W.2d 673, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bohlen-moctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack