State v. Boggess

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Boggess

698 So. 2d 942, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10606, 1997 WL 577834

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 1997·No. No. 97-2120·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State seeks certiorari review of an order permitting the defendant to withdraw his demand for discovery, and denying the State’s motion to compel reciprocal discovery.

Upon the defendant’s proper confession of error, we grant the State’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari and quash the order on review. “Once a defendant makes a written demand for discovery, he is committed to the disclosure process and must reciprocate by making disclosures to the prosecution as required by the rule.” State v. Meggison, 556 So.2d 816, 816 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Petition granted; order quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State seeks certiorari review of an order permitting the defendant to withdraw his demand for discovery, and denying the State’s motion to compel reciprocal discovery.

Upon the defendant’s proper confession of error, we grant the State’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari and quash the order on review. “Once a defendant makes a written demand for discovery, he is committed to the disclosure process and must reciprocate by making disclosures to the prosecution as required by the rule.” State v. Meggison, 556 So.2d 816, 816 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Petition granted; order quashed.

State v. Boggess, 698 So. 2d 942, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10606, 1997 WL 577834 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

698 So. 2d 942 (State v. Boggess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related