Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Boggess

State v. Boggess

698 So. 2d 942, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10606, 1997 WL 577834
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 17, 1997
DocketNo. 97-2120
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 698 So. 2d 942 (State v. Boggess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Boggess, 698 So. 2d 942, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10606, 1997 WL 577834 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State seeks certiorari review of an order permitting the defendant to withdraw his demand for discovery, and denying the State’s motion to compel reciprocal discovery.

Upon the defendant’s proper confession of error, we grant the State’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari and quash the order on review. “Once a defendant makes a written demand for discovery, he is committed to the disclosure process and must reciprocate by making disclosures to the prosecution as required by the rule.” State v. Meggison, 556 So.2d 816, 816 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Petition granted; order quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barahona v. State
172 So. 3d 470 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
698 So. 2d 942, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10606, 1997 WL 577834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boggess-fladistctapp-1997.