State v. BODENSTEDT

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. BODENSTEDT

696 S.E.2d 586, 388 S.C. 279, 2010 S.C. LEXIS 258

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJuly 26, 2010

Docket26842

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 696 S.E.2d 586 (State v. BODENSTEDT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. BODENSTEDT, 696 S.E.2d 586, 388 S.C. 279, 2010 S.C. LEXIS 258 (S.C. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals decision in State v. Bodenstedt, 881 S.C. 545, 674 S.E.2d 174 (Ct.App.2009). On certiorari, we were presented with the question whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing and remanding Respondent’s sentence, which the trial court amended based on Respondent’s disturbances in the courtroom. After careful consideration, we now dismiss certiorari as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals decision in State v. Bodenstedt, 881 S.C. 545, 674 S.E.2d 174 (Ct.App.2009). On certiorari, we were presented with the question whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing and remanding Respondent’s sentence, which the trial court amended based on Respondent’s disturbances in the courtroom. After careful consideration, we now dismiss certiorari as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

696 S.E.2d 586, 388 S.C. 279, 2010 S.C. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bodenstedt-sc-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack