State v. BODENSTEDT
696 S.E.2d 586, 388 S.C. 279, 2010 S.C. LEXIS 258
Opinion
We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals decision in State v. Bodenstedt, 881 S.C. 545, 674 S.E.2d 174 (Ct.App.2009). On certiorari, we were presented with the question whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing and remanding Respondent’s sentence, which the trial court amended based on Respondent’s disturbances in the courtroom. After careful consideration, we now dismiss certiorari as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. BODENSTEDT, 696 S.E.2d 586, 388 S.C. 279, 2010 S.C. LEXIS 258 (S.C. 2010).
696 S.E.2d 586 (State v. BODENSTEDT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Gay
696 S.E.2d 586 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2010)