Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Boczar

State v. Boczar

847 N.E.2d 4, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1454
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 10, 2006
Docket2006-0550
StatusPublished

This text of 847 N.E.2d 4 (State v. Boczar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Boczar, 847 N.E.2d 4, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1454 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

Ashtabula App. No. 2004-A-0063, 2005-Ohio-6910. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed March 6, 2006:

“Whether R.C. 4511.19(D)(4)(b), providing that the results of field sobriety tests are admissible if the officer administered the tests in substantial compliance with the testing standards, is constitutional.”

Resnicic and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict cases are State v. Robinson, Fairfield App. No. 2004-CA-45, 160 Ohio App.3d 802, 2005-Ohio-2280, and State v. Hall, Licking App. No. 2004-CA-115, 163 Ohio App.3d 90, 2005-Ohio-4271.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Robinson
828 N.E.2d 1050 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State v. Boczar, Unpublished Decision (12-23-2005)
2005 Ohio 6910 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State v. Hall
836 N.E.2d 614 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
847 N.E.2d 4, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boczar-ohio-2006.