Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Boatman

State v. Boatman

848 P.2d 148, 119 Or. App. 148, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 540
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 31, 1993
Docket91C-20444, 91C-20891; CA A74257, A74258
StatusPublished

This text of 848 P.2d 148 (State v. Boatman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Boatman, 848 P.2d 148, 119 Or. App. 148, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 540 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, and criminal mischief in the second degree. ORS 164.354. In CA A74258, his probation was revoked on two other convictions in CA A74257. The cases were consolidated for appeal. Defendant challenges only the sentence imposed on the burglary conviction. The state concedes that the court erred in sentencing on that conviction under ORS 137.635. We accept that concession. State v. Haydon, 116 Or App 347, 842 P2d 410 (1992).

Sentence for burglary in the first degree in CA A74258 vacated and remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Haydon
842 P.2d 410 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
848 P.2d 148, 119 Or. App. 148, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boatman-orctapp-1993.