State v. Board of Public Instruction for the County

125 So. 357, 98 Fla. 1152
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 28, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 125 So. 357 (State v. Board of Public Instruction for the County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Board of Public Instruction for the County, 125 So. 357, 98 Fla. 1152 (Fla. 1929).

Opinion

Whitfield, P. J.

This appeal is from a decree validating interest bearing time warrants to be issued by the County Board of Public Instruction for Indian River County, under Chapter 14550, Acts of 1929, extra session. The Act is entitled:

"AN ACT to Authorize the Board of Public Instruction for Any County in the State of Florida, Which Said County Has an Assessed Valuation on the Real and Personal Property, Situate Therein, of Not Less than Four Million, Five Hundred and Thirty-eight Thousand, Seven Hundred and Ten Dollars ($4,538,-710.00) and Not More Than Four Million, Five Hundred and Thirty-eight Thousand, Seven Hundred and Twelve Dollars ($4,538,712.00), as Shown by the Assessment Roll of Said County Prepared by the County Tax Assessor Thereof for the Year 1928 and Approved by the Board of County Commissioners of Said County, to Procure a Loan or Loans of Not Exceeding Two Hundred Thousand ($200,000.00) Dollars and Pay Interest Thereon at a Rate Not Exceeding Eight Per Cent Per Annum, for the Purpose of Paying Salaries to Teachers Employed by Said Board in the Public Free Schools of Said County, for the Purpose of Paying Salaries of Any Other Employees of Said Board, for the Purpose of Maintaining, Repairing, Furnishing and/or Equipping Any of the Public School Buildings in Said County and/or for the Purpose of Paying Any and All Legitimate Expenses Incurred in Operating the Public Free Schools of Said County; to Authorize Said Board, in Order to Procure Said Loan, to Issue and Sell Not Exceeding Two Hundred Thousand ($200,000.00) Dollars in Principal Amount of Interest *1154 Bearing Time Warrants; to Make Provision for a Sinking Fund for the Retirement of Said Warrants and the interest to Become Dne Thereon; to Regulate the Expenditures of the Sum Derived from the Sale of Said Warrants; to Authorize Said Board to Prescribe the Form, Date of Maturity, Denomination and Time and Place of Payment of Said Time Warrants.”

If such enactment is not inoperative because it is in legal effect a local law enacted in violation of Section 21, Article III, Constitution, as amended in 1928 (see page 1597, Gen. Laws of 1927), the enactment does violate Section 9, Article XII, Constitution, as amended in 1926, in that it purports to authorize the county board of public instruction to issue interest bearing time warrants which would in effect be the equivalent of bonds, made payable from the county school funds of the county, on which to borrow money ‘ ‘ for the support and maintenance of public free schools” in the county. Section 9, Article XII, Constitution, as amended in 1926, specifies the sources from which the county school fund shall be derived. The Constitution contemplates an annual budget of county school expenditures and does not contemplate that interest bearing time warrants or bonds shall be issued and sold to raise county school funds “for the support and maintenance of public free schools. ’ ’ The phrase “with all other school funds” contained in said Section 9 as amended does not refer to- the_ proceeds of interest bearing time warrants or bonds to be issued and sold by the county board of public instruction and made payable from the county school funds that are provided for by the Constitution. The county school funds can be used “solely for the support and maintenance of public free schools, ’ ’ and the Constitution does not provide for or permit the county school fund to be used for the payment of *1155 bonds issued for county school current expenses. Leonard v. Franklin, v. 84 Fla. 402, 93 So. R. 688; Barrows v. Moffett, 95 Fla. 111, 116 So. R. 71.

Reversed.

Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Board of Public Instruction
48 So. 2d 912 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)
State v. Bd. of Public Instruction, Levy Cty.
196 So. 452 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
State v. Board of Public Instruction
190 So. 686 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Adams v. Saunders
191 So. 312 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Olds v. Alvord
183 So. 711 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Fidelity Life Ass'n v. Board of Public Instruction
10 F. Supp. 657 (S.D. Florida, 1935)
Logan v. the Board of Public Instruction
158 So. 720 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
National City Bank v. Board of Public Instruction
11 F. Supp. 570 (S.D. Florida, 1934)
Board of Public Instruction v. Kennedy
147 So. 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Board Public Instruction v. First National Bank
143 So. 738 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Board of Public Instruction v. McKenzie
137 So. 899 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 So. 357, 98 Fla. 1152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-board-of-public-instruction-for-the-county-fla-1929.