State v. Blum

84 S.W. 873, 185 Mo. 618, 1904 Mo. LEXIS 340
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedDecember 24, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 S.W. 873 (State v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Blum, 84 S.W. 873, 185 Mo. 618, 1904 Mo. LEXIS 340 (Mo. 1904).

Opinion

GANTT, P. J.

This is an appeal from the circuit court of Clark county. On the 24th day of April, 1902, an information was filed by the prosecuting attorney of Clark county, duly verified by Ms affidavit, charging the defendant, together with one Theodore Blum, with an assault with intent to kill one Jasper Downs.

On the 10th of November, 1902, the said defendants were duly arraigned and pleaded not guilty.

At the same time they were put on their trial and the defendant Blum was acquitted, and the defendant Oldenhage convicted and Ms punishment assessed at a fine of one hundred dollars. Prom that'sentence defendant Oldenhage appealed to the St. Louis Court of Appeals. As the offense was á felony that court properly certified the record to this court. Leave to file a bill of exceptions on or before April 15, 1903, was granted defendant Oldenhage, but he never filed the same, and the cause is before us on the record proper alone.

The information is sufficient, and the arraignment, impaneling of the jury and the sentence are all in due form, and the judgment must be and is affirmed.

Foco, J., concurs; Burgess, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Missouri Interstate Paper Co. v. Gresham
116 S.W.2d 228 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 S.W. 873, 185 Mo. 618, 1904 Mo. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-blum-mo-1904.