State v. Blue

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Blue

392 S.W.3d 528, 2013 WL 704288, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 236

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 26, 2013·No. No. ED 97818·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carlos R. Blue appeals from the judgment and sentence entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of sexual assault, forcible sodomy, deviate sexual assault, and victim tampering. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise, nor did it abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carlos R. Blue appeals from the judgment and sentence entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of sexual assault, forcible sodomy, deviate sexual assault, and victim tampering. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise, nor did it abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Blue, 392 S.W.3d 528, 2013 WL 704288, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 236 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

392 S.W.3d 528 (State v. Blue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.