State v. Blow
135 S.E.2d 17, 261 N.C. 467, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 817
Opinion
The State’s evidence against this defendant was substantially the same as the evidence in the case of S. v. Davis, ante, 463.
The defendant’s assignments of error purport to raise the same questions raised in the above case. The trial, verdict and judgment entered in this case will be upheld on authority of the opinion in S. v. Davis, supra.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Blow, 135 S.E.2d 17, 261 N.C. 467, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 817 (N.C. 1964).
135 S.E.2d 17 (State v. Blow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blow v. North Carolina
379 U.S. 684 (Supreme Court, 1965)