State v. Blodget
1 Root 534
This text of 1 Root 534 (State v. Blodget) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Blodget, 1 Root 534 (Colo. 1793).
Opinion
In ordinary cases tbe writing charged to be a forgery, must be produced in court, before any evidence can be admitted concerning tbe facts. The attorney for tbe state not being able to produce tbe writing entered a nol. pros. See State v. Osborn, New Haven, January Term, A. D. 1790.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-blodget-conn-1793.