State v. Bletsch
866 A.2d 1288, 272 Conn. 918, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 33
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 20, 2005
DocketSC 17340
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 866 A.2d 1288 (State v. Bletsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Bletsch, 866 A.2d 1288, 272 Conn. 918, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 33 (Colo. 2005).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 186 (AC 24260), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for exemption from the sex offender registry?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s convictions for sexual assault in the second degree and risk of injury to a child did not constitute double jeopardy?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Bletsch
912 A.2d 992 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
866 A.2d 1288, 272 Conn. 918, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bletsch-conn-2005.