State v. Blankenship
This text of 968 S.W.2d 268 (State v. Blankenship) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[269]*269 ORDER
Defendant Jerome Blankenship was found guilty following a jury trial of involuntary manslaughter in violation of section 565.024 RSMo 1994, and two counts of assault in the second degree in violation of section 565.060 RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced to a prison term of fourteen years. Defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled. Defendant appeals.
The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. However, we have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
968 S.W.2d 268, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1084, 1998 WL 296486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-blankenship-moctapp-1998.