State v. Blankenship

968 S.W.2d 268, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1084, 1998 WL 296486
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 1998·No. No. 72505·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[269] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Jerome Blankenship was found guilty following a jury trial of involuntary manslaughter in violation of section 565.024 RSMo 1994, and two counts of assault in the second degree in violation of section 565.060 RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced to a prison term of fourteen years. Defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled. Defendant appeals.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. However, we have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Blankenship, 968 S.W.2d 268, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1084, 1998 WL 296486 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

968 S.W.2d 268 (State v. Blankenship) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blankenship v. State
23 S.W.3d 848 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)