State v. Blank
This text of 149 P.3d 330 (State v. Blank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals his judgment of conviction for possession of a Schedule II controlled substance, former ORS 475.992(4)(b) (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840(3)(b) (2005), assigning error to the denial of his motion to suppress all evidence obtained as a result of a search of defendant’s vehicle. Defendant argues that the evidence was obtained through an illegal search of the vehicle in violation of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. The state concedes that, under State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005), which was decided after this trial, the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress. We agree and accept the state’s concession.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 P.3d 330, 209 Or. App. 807, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-blank-orctapp-2006.