State v. Blank

149 P.3d 330, 209 Or. App. 807, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1920
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 13, 2006
Docket03FE0138; A124596
StatusPublished

This text of 149 P.3d 330 (State v. Blank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Blank, 149 P.3d 330, 209 Or. App. 807, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1920 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his judgment of conviction for possession of a Schedule II controlled substance, former ORS 475.992(4)(b) (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840(3)(b) (2005), assigning error to the denial of his motion to suppress all evidence obtained as a result of a search of defendant’s vehicle. Defendant argues that the evidence was obtained through an illegal search of the vehicle in violation of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. The state concedes that, under State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005), which was decided after this trial, the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hall
115 P.3d 908 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 P.3d 330, 209 Or. App. 807, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-blank-orctapp-2006.