State v. Bland

Nebraska Supreme Court

State v. Bland

217 N.W.2d 840, 191 Neb. 765, 1974 Neb. LEXIS 946

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedMay 9, 1974

DocketNo. 39236

StatusPublished

This text of 217 N.W.2d 840 (State v. Bland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bland, 217 N.W.2d 840, 191 Neb. 765, 1974 Neb. LEXIS 946 (Neb. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Clinton, J.

The defendant was charged under the provisions of section 28-401, R. R. S. 1943, with having killed John R. Wisotzkey while in the perpretation of a robbery. [766]*766He was found guilty by a jury and punishment fixed at life imprisonment. The court imposed sentence in accordance with the verdict.

This is a companion case to State v. Montgomery, ante p. 470, 215 N. W. 2d 881; and State v. Dittrich, ante p. 475, 215 N. W. 2d 637.

The issue on this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction in that it is claimed there is no evidence that the defendant had any intention to rob Wisotzkey. The evidence clearly supports a finding that the defendant aided and abetted the assault by the persons who committed the actual robbery. The issue raised on this appeal is essentially the same as the one disposed of in State v. Montgomery, supra, although raised in a slightly different context in that no attack is made upon instructions as such. This case is governed by our holding in State v. Montgomery, supra. Such difference as there is in the evidence in the two cases is not material on the point raised.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clinton, J.

The defendant was charged under the provisions of section 28-401, R. R. S. 1943, with having killed John R. Wisotzkey while in the perpretation of a robbery. [766]*766He was found guilty by a jury and punishment fixed at life imprisonment. The court imposed sentence in accordance with the verdict.

This is a companion case to State v. Montgomery, ante p. 470, 215 N. W. 2d 881; and State v. Dittrich, ante p. 475, 215 N. W. 2d 637.

The issue on this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction in that it is claimed there is no evidence that the defendant had any intention to rob Wisotzkey. The evidence clearly supports a finding that the defendant aided and abetted the assault by the persons who committed the actual robbery. The issue raised on this appeal is essentially the same as the one disposed of in State v. Montgomery, supra, although raised in a slightly different context in that no attack is made upon instructions as such. This case is governed by our holding in State v. Montgomery, supra. Such difference as there is in the evidence in the two cases is not material on the point raised.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 N.W.2d 840, 191 Neb. 765, 1974 Neb. LEXIS 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bland-neb-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack