State v. Blalock

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 31, 2005·No. 2005-MO-022·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court


The State,        Respondent,

v.

Brentley Allen Blalock,        Petitioner.


ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS


Appeal From Spartanburg County
Donald W. Beatty, Circuit Court Judge


Memorandum Opinion No. 2005-MO-022
Heard May 5, 2005 – Filed May 31, 2005


DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED


Jack B. Swerling, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport, all of Columbia, and Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.


PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review State v. Blalock, 357 S.C. 74, 591 S.E.2d 632 (Ct. App. 2003).  After careful review of the appendix and briefs, we dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Blalock, (S.C. 2005).

State v. Blalock (State v. Blalock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Blalock
591 S.E.2d 632 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2003)