State v. Blake

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Blake

163 S.W.3d 471, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 521, 2005 WL 756733

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 5, 2005·No. ED 84411·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Ricky A. Blake, appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury of trafficking drugs in the first degree, in violation of section 195.222 RSMo (2000), and possession of a controlled substance, in violation of section 195.202 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior drug offender and sentenced him to concurrent terms of 20 years imprisonment and 7 years imprisonment, respectively.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Ricky A. Blake, appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury of trafficking drugs in the first degree, in violation of section 195.222 RSMo (2000), and possession of a controlled substance, in violation of section 195.202 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior drug offender and sentenced him to concurrent terms of 20 years imprisonment and 7 years imprisonment, respectively.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Blake, 163 S.W.3d 471, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 521, 2005 WL 756733 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

163 S.W.3d 471 (State v. Blake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.