State v. Blair

Supreme Court of Kansas

State v. Blair

421 P.2d 32, 197 Kan. 693

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedDecember 10, 1966

Docket44,240

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 421 P.2d 32 (State v. Blair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Blair, 421 P.2d 32, 197 Kan. 693 (kan 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

O’Connor, J.:

This is a direct criminal appeal. On July 2, 1964, the defendant (appellant), represented by court-appointed counsel, pleaded guilty to the offense of burglary in the second degree (G. S. 1961 Supp., 21-520, now K. S. A. 21-520) and was sentenced to the state penitentiary for a term of not less than five years nor more than ten years.

Notice of appeal was filed by the defendant pro se, and present counsel was appointed. Defendant now raises three points on appeal, none of which was ever presented or determined in the district court, nor are they factually substantiated in the record.

The facts and issues presented in this case are practically identical to those in the case of appellant’s co-defendant with whom he was jointly charged in the information (State v. Arlis Blair, 197 Kan. 691, 421 P. 2d 22). The rule applied there that this court will not for the first time consider issues on appeal which have not been presented or determined in the district court controls the disposition of this appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

O’Connor, J.:

This is a direct criminal appeal. On July 2, 1964, the defendant (appellant), represented by court-appointed counsel, pleaded guilty to the offense of burglary in the second degree (G. S. 1961 Supp., 21-520, now K. S. A. 21-520) and was sentenced to the state penitentiary for a term of not less than five years nor more than ten years.

Notice of appeal was filed by the defendant pro se, and present counsel was appointed. Defendant now raises three points on appeal, none of which was ever presented or determined in the district court, nor are they factually substantiated in the record.

The facts and issues presented in this case are practically identical to those in the case of appellant’s co-defendant with whom he was jointly charged in the information (State v. Arlis Blair, 197 Kan. 691, 421 P. 2d 22). The rule applied there that this court will not for the first time consider issues on appeal which have not been presented or determined in the district court controls the disposition of this appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 P.2d 32, 197 Kan. 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-blair-kan-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack