State v. Blackmon

44 S.W.3d 443, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 702, 2001 WL 435271
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 1, 2001·No. No. WD 58050·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Michael Blackmon appeals his conviction of the Class D felony of violation of an order of protection, second offense, § 455.085.8, RSMo. He questions 1) the trial court’s discretion in allowing improper testimony of prior abuse as evidence of other crimes or bad acts; 2) the sufficiency of the information; and 3) the sufficiency of the State’s evidence. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Blackmon, 44 S.W.3d 443, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 702, 2001 WL 435271 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

44 S.W.3d 443 (State v. Blackmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blackmon v. State
168 S.W.3d 129 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)