State v. Blackhoop
This text of 1997 ND 242 (State v. Blackhoop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 12/19/97 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1997 ND 242
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Harriet Blackhoop, a/k/a
Harriet Cruz, Defendant and Appellant
Criminal No. 970214
Appeal from the District Court for Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Gregory Ian Runge (argued), Suite A, 418 E. Rosser Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellant.
Ladd R. Erickson (argued), Assistant State’s Attorney, 210 2nd Avenue Northwest, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for plaintiff and appellee.
State v. Blackhoop
[¶1] Harriet Blackhoop appeals from a district court order and judgment following a jury trial finding her guilty on three counts of violating N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23, delivery of controlled substances. The district court judgment is affirmed under Rule 35.1(a)(3) and (4), N.D.R.App.P.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
William A. Neumann
Herbert L. Meschke
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1997 ND 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-blackhoop-nd-1997.