State v. Black

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Black

450 S.W.3d 811, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, 2014 WL 6908134

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 9, 2014·No. WD 77003·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per curiam:

. Mark Black appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of two counts of assault in the first degree and two counts of armed criminal action. Black argues on appeal that the trial court erred in two respects. First, Black asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his objection to a misstatement of evidence during the State’s rebuttal argument. Second, Black claims that the trial court erred in failing to declare a mistrial or otherwise strike the prosecutor’s comments during the rebuttal argument that were improper, inflammatory, and highly prejudicial. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per curiam:

. Mark Black appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of two counts of assault in the first degree and two counts of armed criminal action. Black argues on appeal that the trial court erred in two respects. First, Black asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his objection to a misstatement of evidence during the State’s rebuttal argument. Second, Black claims that the trial court erred in failing to declare a mistrial or otherwise strike the prosecutor’s comments during the rebuttal argument that were improper, inflammatory, and highly prejudicial. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Black, 450 S.W.3d 811, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, 2014 WL 6908134 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

450 S.W.3d 811 (State v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.