State v. Bizette

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Bizette

325 So. 2d 606, 1976 La. LEXIS 4849

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 30, 1976

DocketNo. 57360

StatusPublished

This text of 325 So. 2d 606 (State v. Bizette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bizette, 325 So. 2d 606, 1976 La. LEXIS 4849 (La. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Rickey Bizette applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Granted. (See Order.)

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Daniel W. LeBlanc Judge of the 19th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 23rd day of February, 1976, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.-

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 21st day of May, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Rickey Bizette applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Granted. (See Order.)

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Daniel W. LeBlanc Judge of the 19th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 23rd day of February, 1976, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.-

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 21st day of May, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

325 So. 2d 606, 1976 La. LEXIS 4849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bizette-la-1976.