State v. Bispham
711 A.2d 728, 244 Conn. 929, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 175
This text of 711 A.2d 728 (State v. Bispham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Bispham, 711 A.2d 728, 244 Conn. 929, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 175 (Colo. 1998).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 135 (AC 15820), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a written statement of the complainant as constancy of accusation evidence, and that the defendant did not show prejudice from the admission of such evidence, despite the prosecutor’s closing argument that the written statement would be available for review in the jury room to support the complainant’s credibility?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Bispham
731 A.2d 294 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
711 A.2d 728, 244 Conn. 929, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bispham-conn-1998.